Okay I am the first to admit that I am extremely skeptical when it comes to cryptozoology.  I personally do not believe in the Loch Ness Monster, nor am I convinced the picture in this article is that of a mythical creature from 565AD.

However, I do love this sort of stuff, and I like mainstream attention to these topics taken in a serious way.  Therefore, I am linking it for your review, despite my personal feelings of improbability.